||4.8/ 5||$$$$||Check Price|
|4.4/ 5||$$||Check Price|
|4.7/ 5||$$$$||Check Price|
|4.3/ 5||$$$$||Check Price|
High-top hiking boots: much better than low-rise shoes?
That one bedevils a great deal of hikers: do I must say i need hiking boots that review the heel?
You might, but most likely not for the reason why you think.
Back when I got a Guy Scout in the 1970s, we’d two selections: heavy-duty clodhoppers or whatever tennis shoes we had lying down around. When I acquired back to hiking in 2004, I used to be gladdened to see boot companies experienced become smart and created “trail shoes,” that have the beefy bottoms of an boot but stop below the ankle joint, conserving weight and adding comfort on long treks.
Path shoes are a great invention, but rookies might ask yourself: don’t hikers need ankle support?
They actually, but some tips about what I believe: ankle joint “support” provided by high-top boots is basically an illusion. As I’ve mentioned here before, if your ankle joint zigs whenever your calf zags, that little swath of leather won’t prevent a sprain or a rest. My reasoning: if high-top boots provided important support, why do those soccer and hockey players religiously tape their ankles?
Actually the best discussion for high-top boots is that they protect the bony protrusion of your ankle joint — it can just stand out there on both factors and will show up magnetically drawn to sundry stones and roots over the trail.